Questions:
- For the numerical experiments and theoretical derivation, which one goes first?
- Should we include the part: post-buckling analysis. This shows that the Clausen profile has more robust post-buckling behavior than cylinder or ellipsoid. We have numerical solution for Clausen and ellipsoid, theoretical solution for cylinder, FEA data and asymptotic analysis using Koiter’s theory for three shapes.
- Is it worth finding out the optimal profile that is least sensitive to imperfection or proofing the Clausen profile is the optimal one?
- What should we talk in Introduction section?
Introduction serves like the main function of a program. The other parts are just subroutines. The reader should understand the main idea of the paper by just going through the introduction.
model: Gao’s sensitivity paper in PNAS
- Introduction
- Traditional biological material : Bone, nacre
- high stiffness, light weight material : bamboo
- truss structure, grid
- from nature to engineering, rare
*
- read papers about imperfection sensitivity
- Think about the volume constraints
Questions
- For the numerical experiments and theoretical derivation, which one goes first?
- Should we include the part: post-buckling analysis. This shows that the Clausen profile has more robust post-buckling behavior than cylinder or ellipsoid. We have numerical solution for Clausen and ellipsoid, theoretical solution for cylinder, FEA data and asymptotic analysis using Koiter’s theory for three shapes.
- Is it worth finding out the optimal profile that is least sensitive to imperfection or proofing the Clausen profile is the optimal one?
- What should we talk in Introduction section?
</ul>
</details>